MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097777568 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.1542

CUA-CUOG Guidelines for the Management of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC): 2013 Update

2013· article· en· W2097777568 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Fred Saad, Sebastién J. Hotte, Charles Catton, Darrel Drachenberg, Antonio Finelli, Neil Fleshner, Martin Gleave, Anil Kapoor, Wassim Kassouf, Andrew Loblaw, Scott North, Nawaid Usmani, Kim N.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Boniface HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of ManitobaBC Cancer AgencyMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia HospitalMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbiraterone acetateEnzalutamideProstate cancerDocetaxelRegimenAndrogen deprivation therapyOncologyInternal medicineLymph nodeHormonal therapyCancerUrologyAndrogen receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of CRPC guidelines 2013Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) includes a wide range of disease types: from patients without metastases or symptoms with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels despite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to patients with metastases and significant debilitation due to cancer symptoms.The panel recommends that ADT be continued in the presence of CRPC (Fig. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207