MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097785863 · doi:10.1080/00926230152051707

Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Definitions and Classifications

2001· article· en· W2097785863 on OpenAlexaff
Rosemary Basson, Jennifer R. Berman, Arthur L. Burnett, Leonard R. Derogatis, David M. Ferguson, Jean L. Fourcroy, Irwin Goldstein, Alessandra Graziottin, Julia R. Heiman, Ellen Laan, Sandra R. Leiblum, Harin Padma-Nathan, Raymond C. Rosen, K. B. Segraves, Robert Segraves, Ridwan Shabsigh, Marcalee Sipski, Gorm Wagner, Beverly Whipple

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sex & Marital Therapy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsensus conferencePsychologySexual dysfunctionMedicinePsychoanalysisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Female sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent but not well defined or understood. We evaluated and revised existing definitions and classifications of female sexual dysfunction.Materials a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.186
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.148
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1860.148
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0110.006
Research integrity0.0060.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sex & Marital TherapySame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207