MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097867327 · doi:10.1002/chem.201101397

Conjugated 4‐Methoxybipyrrole Thiophene Azomethines: Synthesis, Opto‐Electronic Properties, and Crystallographic Characterization

2011· article· en· W2097867327 on OpenAlexaff
Tshitundu Tshibaka, Sophie Bishop, Ivan Ulliel Roche, Stéphane Dufresne, William D. Lubell, W. G. Skene

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugated systemThiopheneElectrochromismTriethylamineChemistryTrifluoroacetic acidDopingCrystallizationMaterials sciencePhotochemistryCombinatorial chemistryPolymerOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the search of functional materials with improved electrochromic properties, thiophenes and asymmetric bipyrroles have been conjugated with azomethine units. 4-Methoxy-2,2'-bipyrroles 3-6 were first synthesized by a general route from 4-hydroxyproline and converted subsequently to dialdehydes 8-15, which underwent condensations with different aminothiophenes to provide azomethine conjugates 14-18 and 20-22. The crystallization and X-ray analysis of 20 showed the heterocycles and azomethine bonds were all co-planar with the heterocycles adopting an anti-parallel arrangement. These configurations result in extended conjugation and enhanced opto-electronic properties of the azomethines. Oxidation potential (E(pa)) was tailored by modification of the substitution pattern of the terminal thiophenes and central pyrroles of the azomethines. The combined low E(pa) and extended azomethine degree of conjugation resulted in stark color transitions occurring between their neutral and oxidized states. Reversible color formation was induced both electrochemically and by doping/de-doping with trifluoroacetic acid/triethylamine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207