MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097927160 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.06.005

Two-warehouse production policy for different demands under volume flexibility

2013· article· en· W2097927160 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sanjay Sharma, S.R. Singh, Himani Dem

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)WarehouseHolding costOperations researchVolume (thermodynamics)Production (economics)Stock (firearms)Mathematical optimizationCarrying costFunction (biology)Computer scienceOperations managementEconomicsTotal costMicroeconomicsMathematicsBusinessEngineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an inventory model of two-warehouse is considered, which evaluates the impact of a reduction rate in the selling price with volume flexibility.In real life, there are many products, which may decay or deteriorate or become obsolete.Therefore, one alternative is to clear the stock by selling a large amount of items at reduced prices.Taking this concept into account, this paper considers a fixed demand rate at the beginning of planning until the certain time point occurs, while demand is assumed to follow the pattern of nonlinear and non-decreasing power function of the reduction rate.The total cost function includes warehouse and rented warehouse holding costs, set up cost and the production cost.Numerical illustrations are given to exemplify the model and the proposed model is solved using a Genetic Algorithm (GA) with sensitivity analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering ComputationsSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207