Efficient Target Recovery Using STAGE for Mean-shift Tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robust visual tracking is a challenging problem, especially when a target undergoes complete occlusion or leaves and later re-enters the camera view. The mean-shift tracker is an efficient appearance-based tracking algorithm that has become very popular in recent years. Many researchers have developed extensions to the algorithm that improve the appearance model used in target localization. We approach the problem from a slightly different angle and seek to improve the robustness of the mean-shift tracker by integrating an efficient failure recovery mechanism. The proposed method uses a novel application of the STAGE algorithm to efficiently recover a target in the event of tracking failure. The STAGE algorithm boosts the performance of a local search algorithm by iteratively learning an evaluation function to predict good states for initiating searches. STAGE can be viewed as a random-restart algorithm that chooses promising restart states based on the shape of the state space, as estimated using the search trajectories from previous iterations. In the proposed method, an adapted version of STAGE is applied to the mean-shift target localization algorithm (Bhattacharyya coefficient maximization using the mean-shift procedure) to efficiently recover the lost target. Experiments indicate that the proposed method is viable as a technique for recovering from failure caused by complete occlusion or departure from the camera view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".