Dynamic modeling of cable system using a new nodal position finite element method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The handling of cable systems onboard surface ships and submarines presents a significant technical challenge to design engineers in defense and ocean industries. The current approaches rely heavily on empirical methods and time‐consuming/expensive prototype testing. Computer simulation provides a cost effective way to reduce the high risks associated with the design of the cable‐towed system. This paper presents a new nodal position finite element method (FEM) to effectively simulate the dynamics of cable system experiencing large rigid body rotation coupled with small elastic deformation. The existing FEM deals with the large rigid body rotation by linearized incremental approximation that is prone to numerical inaccuracies resulting from large 3D rotations. By solving for the position directly instead of indirectly via the displacement, the new FEM does not need to decouple the elastic deformation from the rigid body rotation and thus eliminates the error source arising from the linearized incremental approximation in existing FEM. Analysis results demonstrate that the new FEM algorithm is simple and robust by comparing with numerical benchmark test and experiments including sea trial data. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it