Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Migration across international borders is an identifying feature of 21st century globalization. Employment is an important criterion of integration, however, its prominence has deflected attention from other complex issues, namely how health is influenced by participation through cultural, social, and community occupations. Research on leisure participation has identified its positive impact on the well-being of various populations facing occupational disruptions, thus leisure participation and its potential role in the well-being of ‘immigrant women’ during the occupational disruption and transition of resettlement is worthy of research. Objectives: This study examined participation in leisure occupations for migrant women in the process of resettlement and experiencing changed environments. The research question was: How does the process of resettlement in Canada influence the ways women understand and participate in leisure? Methodology: This study was framed by ethnographic and critical theory perspectives. Data were collected from 14 migrant women in Canada through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically. Findings: The first theme, Orchestrating the Day, illustrates occupational transitions and offers a necessary context for understanding the second theme, Socializing is the Key to Leisure. Bourdieu's concepts of capital and a transactional perspective of action helped to interpret the findings. Conclusion: The participants' daily occupations helped to reveal what constitutes leisure and how leisure fits within their lives. Many women defined leisure broadly as whatever supported their physical and emotional health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".