MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097955275 · doi:10.1109/iscc.2006.137

Quality of Service in TDM/WDM Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs)

2006· article· en· W2097955275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkPassive optical networkComputer scienceDynamic bandwidth allocationBandwidth (computing)Quality of serviceJitterBandwidth allocationOptical line terminationFiber to the x10G-PONTelecommunicationsWavelength-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPONs) are currently being designed to deliver multiple services and applications, such as voice communications (VoIP), standard and highdefinition video (STV and HDTV), video conferencing (interactive video) and data traffic access network. The emergence of new bandwidth intensive applications and the continuous demand for more bandwidth in a bandwidth limited EPON require an upgrade from current TDM to WDM-based PON which is currently of huge interest in both the academia and industry. In this paper we propose three new Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation (DBAs) schemes for QoS support in WDM-based PON networks. These schemes can comply with any ONU architecture (tunable lasers or multiple fixed transceivers). However, they vary in their performances (i.e. different jitter, delay, bandwidth utilization etc.). We study the performance of these DBAs using extensive simulation experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207