MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097965617 · doi:10.1353/can.2005.0063

'Taken on the Spot': The Visual Appropriation of New France for the Global British Landscape

2005· article· en· W2097965617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLandscape and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationGeographyHistoryLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until the arrival of topographic landscape artists with British forces in the 1750s, European representations of North American landscapes usually depended on artists' imaginations, with deliberately schematic and symbolic results. During the British invasion, occupation, and colonization of New France, artists appropriated the conquests visually with topographic renderings of the empire's new landscapes. Post-conquest representations of New France were part of the creation of a global British landscape, with Canada as a distinctive part. Colonial landscapes claiming topographical accuracy became frequent at the same time that Britain extended its imperial interests by conquests and accessions on a global scale - in Canada, the trans-Appalachian West, India, and the Pacific. Evidence from prints, drawings, maps, charts, and fiction show how the sublime aspects of Canada's scenery confirmed the grandeur of the imperial project against New France, while the picturesque landscapes of towns, farms, and shorelines promised an easily governed population readily subject to British improvements. Jusqu'� l'arriv�e des paysagistes topographiques dans les forces britanniques au cours des ann�es 1750, la repr�sentation du paysage nord-am�ricain par les Europ�ens reposait le plus souvent sur la capacit� imaginative de l'artiste, ce qui donnait des r�sultats d�lib�r�ment sch�matiques et symboliques. Durant l'invasion, l'occupation et la colonisation de la Nouvelle-France par les Britanniques, les artistes proc�d�rent � une appropriation visuelle des territoires conquis en peignant la topographie des nouveaux paysages de l'empire. Les repr�sentations de la Nouvelle-France d'apr�s la conqu�te faisaient partie de la cr�ation d'un paysage britannique global, dont le Canada constituait une partie caract�ristique. Les paysages coloniaux se r�clamant d'une topographie exacte firent de fr�quentes apparitions au m�me moment o� la Grande-Bretagne �tendait son empire gr�ce � des conqu�tes et des rattachements men�s � l'�chelle mondiale - Canada, Ouest transappalachien, Inde et Pacifique. Les gravures, dessins, cartes terrestres et marines ainsi que les ouvrages de fiction d�montrent comment le c�t� sublime du paysage canadien venait confirmer la grandeur du projet imp�rial face � la Nouvelle-France, alors que les vues pittoresques des villages, des fermes et des c�tes offraient la promesse d'une population facile � gouverner, pr�te � accepter les am�nagements propos�s par les Britanniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it