MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097993571 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2004.833486

Subsampling Matrices for Wavelet Decompositions on Body Centered Cubic Lattices

2004· article· en· W2097993571 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Entezari, Torsten Möller, J. Vaisey

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsWaveletLattice (music)Filter bankUpsamplingMatrix (chemical analysis)Filter (signal processing)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work derives a family of dilation matrices for the body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice, which is optimal in the sense of spectral sphere packing. While satisfying the necessary conditions for dilation, these matrices are all cube roots of an integer scalar matrix. This property offers theoretical advantages for construction of wavelet functions in addition to the practical advantages when iterating through a perfect reconstruction filter bank based on BCC downsampling. Lastly, we factor the BCC matrix into two matrices that allow us to cascade two two-channel perfect reconstruction filter banks in order to construct a four-channel perfect reconstruction filter bank based on BCC downsampling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207