Brain injury: Assessment of hemineglect occurence and of attentional deficit through cancellation tasks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La heminegligencia (HN) es un sindrome ampliamenteestudiado despues de lesiones unilaterales por accidentecerebral vascular. Sin embargo, a pesar de la existenciade algunos estudios en rehabilitacion de HN despues deltrauma craneoencefalico (TCE), no parece haber publicacionessobre la prevalencia de HN en TCE a partir detareas de cancelacion. De esta forma, el objetivo de esteestudio fue caracterizar la ocurrencia de ese sindrome yde deficits atencionales en pacientes con TCE, a partirdel test de Cancelamento dos Sinos y de una tarea decancelacion de lineas. Participaron 21 pacientes conTCE y 21 controles saludables pareados por escolaridad,edad y frecuencia de habitos de lenguaje escrito. Seencontro un desempeno peor en los pacientes con TCE,con mayor numero de omisiones a la izquierda y mayortiempo de ejecucion. Tambien se encontro que el 38 %de la poblacion de TCE presentaba senales sugerentesde HN. Son necesarias mas investigaciones para caracterizarlos sindromes de subcuadros clinicos de TCE enrelacion con la ocurrencia de HN a partir del reconocidoparadigma de cancelacion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".