MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097994587 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.49

Stability of Multiple Receiving Nodes Slotted ALOHA for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

2008· article· en· W2097994587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetransmissionAlohaComputer networkComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkNode (physics)Network packetBase stationRandom accessWirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Mobile ad hoc networkWireless networkThroughputTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In wireless ad hoc and sensor networks, communication may be achieved without a central entity (base station) and nodes communicate with each other in a half-duplex manner. In those kinds of networks each node either will be in a transmitting mode or in a receiving mode or in an idle mode. Stability of half-duplex slotted ALOHA is studied in terms of the node transmitting probability, the node receiving probability, capture ratio and the number of retransmission attempts. A close form equation is obtained for the stable operation of a distributed random access protocol with multiple receiving nodes. This equation provides the relationship between the new packet transmission probability from each mobile node, capture ratio and the number of retransmission attempts. The results of this study may be used for system design of half-duplex contention- based multiple access schemes with and without capture and retransmission cut-off.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207