MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098000546 · doi:10.2514/6.2005-959

Analytical Modeling of Natural Convection in Horizontal Annuli

2005· article· en· W2098000546 on OpenAlexaff
P. Teertstra, M. M. Yovanovich, J. R. Culham

Bibliographic record

Venue43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural convectionMechanicsNatural (archaeology)ConvectionGeologyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical model is developed for natural convection in the two-dimensional region formed by an isothermal, heated horizontal cylinder concentrically located in a larger, cooled horizontal cylinder. The model is comprised of a combination of three asymptotic solutions, the diffusive limit, the laminar boundary layer limit, and the transition flow limit, and is applicable to a wide range of aspect ratios and inner and outer boundary shapes. Validation of the model is performed using numerical and experimental data from the literature for the circular annulus and a number of other geometries. The model and data are in good agreement, with an average RMS difference of 6% for the circular annulus and less than 9% for the other geometries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207