Repression of light signaling by Arabidopsis SPA1 involves post‐translational regulation of HFR1 protein accumulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arabidopsis uses two major classes of photoreceptors to mediate seedling de-etiolation. The cryptochromes (cry1 and cry2) absorb blue/ultraviolet-A light, whereas the phytochromes (phyA-phyE) predominantly regulate responses to red/far-red light. Arabidopsis COP1 represses light signaling by acting as an E3 ubiquitin ligase in the nucleus, and is responsible for targeted degradation of a number of photomorphogenesis-promoting factors, including HY5, LAF1, phyA, and HFR1. Distinct light signaling pathways initiated by multiple photoreceptors (including both phytochromes and cryptochromes) eventually converge on COP1, causing its inactivation and nuclear depletion. Arabidopsis SPA1, which encodes a protein structurally related to COP1, also represses light signaling under various light conditions. In this study, we present genetic evidence supporting that HFR1, which encodes a photomorphogenesis-promoting bHLH transcription factor, acts downstream of SPA1 and is required for different subsets of branch pathways of light signaling controlled by SPA1 under different light conditions. We show that SPA1 physically interacts with HFR1 in a yeast two-hybrid assay and an in vitro co-immunoprecipitation assay. We demonstrate that higher levels of HFR1 protein accumulate in the spa1 mutant background under various light conditions, including far-red, red, blue, and white light, whereas a marginal increase in HFR1 transcript level is only seen in dark- and far-red light-grown spa1-100 mutants. Together, our data suggest that repression of light signaling by Arabidopsis SPA1 likely involves post-translational regulation of HFR1 protein accumulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".