MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098087097 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2002.804133

Natural gradient learning neural networks for adaptive inversion of Hammerstein systems

2002· article· en· W2098087097 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Ibnkahla

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGradient descentBackpropagationAdaptive filterArtificial neural networkKernel adaptive filterComputer scienceMultilayer perceptronNonlinear systemActivation functionAdaptive systemInversion (geology)PerceptronAlgorithmAdaptive algorithmAdaptive learningFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceFilter design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter applies natural gradient (NG) learning neural networks for adaptive inversion of Hammerstein systems. The system model is composed of a memoryless nonlinearity g(.) followed by a linear filter H. The inverse system is modeled by a neural network composed of an adaptive filter Q followed by a memoryless nonlinear perceptron. The adaptive filter Q aims at inverting the linear part of the system (adaptive deconvolution). The perceptron aims at inverting the memoryless function (adaptive function inversion). The adaptive system is trained using the NG descent algorithm. The letter shows through computer simulations that the NG approach outperforms the classical backpropagation algorithm in terms of mean-squared-error performance and convergence speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207