An Improved Soft Dielectric for a Highly Sensitive Capacitive Tactile Sensor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel capacitive tactile sensor that is capable of making highly accurate measurements at low pressure levels, while also being functional within a wide range of pressure. Many researchers have concentrated on sensing applied pressure using methods, such as piezoresistive, optoelectronics, and piezoelectric technologies; but a very popular approach in recent years uses capacitance-based sensing. However, most capacitive sensors, due to the properties of their dielectrics, remain limited by hysteresis and narrow ranges of sensitivity. Our sensor overcomes these restrictions because of the improved soft dielectric that we have constructed. This dielectric features a double-stage microstructure, allowing it to be very sensitive to low pressure while still able to measure a wide range of pressure. The silicone used to construct the dielectric is doped with high permittivity nanoparticles to enhance the response of the sensor. Furthermore, considering the complexity of the dielectric's construction, our fabrication process is relatively simple. In this paper, we describe the design and fabrication of this dielectric and present the results of our sensor's performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it