MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098114798 · doi:10.1002/rcm.726

Improved peptide detection with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry by trimethylation of amino groups

2002· article· en· W2098114798 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas A. Stewart, Van Thong Pham, Christin T. Choma, Harvey Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPeptideMass spectrometryMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizationProtein mass spectrometryAmino acidChromatographyDesorptionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Tandem mass spectrometryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trimethyl alpha-amino derivatives of peptides (penta to deca) with a permanent positive charge on their alpha-amino groups were prepared by in vacuo reaction with iodomethane and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS). Compared to the unmodified peptide, the signal intensity of the trimethyl alpha-amino derivative in MALDI-MS is increased by at least an order of magnitude. Similarly, an octapeptide with a trimethylated epsilon-amino group derived from the solitary lysine residue of the B-chain of insulin also shows the same relative increase in signal intensity. Another advantage of the in vacuo methylation procedure is that trimethylation of a peptide amino group can be carried out readily with a combination of isotopes (13)CH(3)I and (12)CH(3)I or CD(3)I and CH(3)I, yielding a doublet signal either 3 or 9 units apart, respectively. The presence or absence of such a doublet signal can be used as a criterion to discriminate between peptide and non-peptide signals in the mass spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207