MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098167106 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n4p102

Impact of Foreign Investment in the Yemen's Economic Growth: The Country Political Stability as a Main Issue

2015· article· en· W2098167106 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anwar Salem Musibah, Arfan Shahzad, Faudziah Hanim Fadzil

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance of paymentsForeign direct investmentEconomicsInflation (cosmology)Exchange rateAugmented Dickey–Fuller testPolitical stabilityMonetary economicsChow testInvestment (military)Regression analysisInternational economicsMacroeconomicsPoliticsEconometricsStatisticsMathematicsPolitical scienceCointegration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the moderating role of political stability in the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows into Yemen over the last two decades. Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test was employed to check the stationary of the data. Following the ADF test, the standard and hierarchal regression approaches were used for the analysis. The standard regression results show that the GDP growth rate has significant negative effects on FDI inflows into Yemen while exchange rate, inflation rate, balance of payment, and gross national income have no effect on the FDI inflow in the country. However, when the moderating variable, political stability is used together with other variables such as exchange rate, inflation rate, balance of payment and gross national income, the results of hierarchical regression indicate that these variables are important determinants of FDI inflows into the country. Therefore, the results suggest that political stability is critical for the future growth of Yemen economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207