Resonant spectrum method to characterize piezoelectric films in composite resonators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a direct method to characterize a piezoelectric film that is sandwiched with two electrodes and deposited on a substrate to form a four-layer thickness extension mode composite resonator (also known as over-moded resonator). Based on the parallel and series resonant frequency spectra of a composite resonator, the electromechanical coupling factor, the density and the elastic constant of the piezoelectric film can be evaluated directly. Experimental results on samples consisting of ZnO films on fused quartz substrates with different thickness are presented. They show good agreement with theoretical prediction. The mechanical effect of the electrode on the method is investigated, and numerical simulation shows that the effect of the electrodes can be properly corrected by the modified formulae presented in this paper. The effect of mechanical loss in piezoelectric film and in substrate on this method also has been investigated. It is proven that the method is insensitive to the losses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it