MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098221088 · doi:10.1109/icc.2000.853746

On the balancing of the base stations transmitted powers during soft handoff in cellular CDMA systems

2002· article· en· W2098221088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft handoverBase stationPower controlComputer scienceHandoverCode division multiple accessPower (physics)Computer networkMobile telephonyInterference (communication)Cellular radioReduction (mathematics)Base (topology)Mobile stationControl (management)Real-time computingMobile radioMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power control is essential in CDMA cellular systems to reduce the interference. During soft handoff, the mobile sends a single power control command that all the base stations should apply. Due to errors on the commands, the base stations can adjust their powers in opposite directions. This results in a loss of diversity gain. In this paper we propose changing the way the mobile issues the power control commands. This is basically to let the mobile repeat the same power control command over many slots. This results in reducing the number of times the base stations adjust their powers. This also reduces the error in the power control commands. We show that such an algorithm results in a considerable reduction in the deviation in the base station transmitted powers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207