MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098230607 · doi:10.7202/057583ar

Les catégories sociales de sexe, la politique sociale et l’État-providence en Grande-Bretagne

2005· article· fr· W2098230607 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ellen Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans une perspective à la fois historique et comparative avec les autres régimes de l'Est, cet article examine les incidences des législations égalitaires prises par l'État polonais au lendemain de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, ainsi que les mesures « en faveur » des travailleuses, dont les effets s'avèrent fort contradictoires avec l'intention première. L'exemple du congé parental payé adoptée en 1981, autour duquel l'auteure a mené une enquête dans une dizaine d'entreprises de l'industrie légère, sert à ce propos de révélateur. Prévu à l'origine pour pallier les carences en matière d'équipements de la petite enfance et pour servir de régulateur dans le domaine de l'emploi en prévision d'un hypothétique chômage, il apparaît clairement comme un instrument de la politique officielle assignant aux travailleuses le statut de main-d'oeuvre de réserve et montre le rôle déterminant de l'intervention de l'État dans la construction des inégalités sociales et de sexe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207