MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098234194 · doi:10.1671/0272-4634-28.4.1015

A new Lower Permian amphibamid (Dissorophoidea, Temnospondyli) from the fissure fill deposits near Richards Spur, Oklahoma

2008· article· en· W2098234194 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia B. Fröbisch, Robert R. Reisz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostcraniaSkullPaleontologyTaxonNeurocraniumHolotypeBiologyPermianSister groupMonophylyPennsylvanianGeologyCladeZoologyTaxonomy (biology)Phylogenetic treeStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fissure fills of Richards Spur, Oklahoma, together constitute the most productive Paleozoic continental fossil locality in the world, having produced a wealth of terrestrial vertebrates, including occasional articulated skeletons. A new dissorophoid amphibian is represented by two skulls: an exquisitely preserved, complete small skull and the posterior part of a second skull, almost twice the size of the holotype. The specimens provide detailed information about the skull roof, palate, braincase, and mandible, showing that this new taxon is characterized by a relatively elongate skull with large tabulars and postparietals, and monocuspid, recurved teeth that show no sign of pedicelly. The large, laterally expanded interpterygoid vacuities are covered by a mosaic of small dermal plates, each carrying more than a dozen strongly recurved teeth. A phylogenetic analysis of 17 ingroup taxa and 62 cranial and postcranial characters yielded a single most-parsimonious tree with the new taxon in a monophyletic Amphibamidae as the sister taxon to the Lower Triassic Micropholis from South Africa. In addition, the new analysis supports a basal split of Amphibamidae into two distinct clades, one containing the new taxon, Micropholis, along with Tersomius, and the other comprising Amphibamus, Gerobatrachus, Doleserpeton, Platyrhinops, Plemmyradytes, Eoscopus, and Georgenthalia. The data retrieved from this new taxon provides insights into the evolution and diversity of the Amphibamidae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vertebrate PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207