MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098259453 · doi:10.2312/vg/vg-pbg08/057-064

Isosurface Ambient Occlusion and Soft Shadows with Filterable Occlusion Maps

2008· article· en· W2098259453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurographics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsosurfaceRendering (computer graphics)Shadow mappingComputer scienceVoxelOcclusionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputationComputer graphics (images)Real-time renderingVisualizationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volumetric data sets are often examined by displaying isosurfaces, surfaces where the data or function takes on a given value. We propose a new method for rendering isosurfaces at interactive rates while supporting dynamic ambient occlusion and/or soft shadows and requiring minimal pre-computation time. By approximating the occlusion in a region as the percentage of occluding voxels in that region, we reduce the ambient occlusion problem to the same problem faced in soft shadow mapping algorithms. In order to quickly extract the number of occluding voxels in an image region, we propose representing distributions using filterable representations such as variance shadow maps or convolution shadow maps. By choosing different sampling patterns from these maps we can dynamically approximate ambient occlusion and/or soft shadows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it