MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098279507 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.1991.252014

Decimation IIR filter for oversampled A/D based on multiobjective optimization

2002· article· en· W2098279507 on OpenAlex
Z.P. Ma, Bosco Leung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecimationInfinite impulse responseQuantization (signal processing)OversamplingFinite impulse responseComputer scienceAlgorithmFilter designMathematicsFilter (signal processing)2D FiltersDigital filterMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Describes a decimation infinite impulse response (IIR) filter design methodology by formulating a multiobjective programming that optimizes both magnitude and phase response. A general condition relating to an approximate linear phase IIR filter design is given. A novel approximation method, called samples-sum-estimation, is introduced to simplify the original objective which provides the flexibility of maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) subject to certain anti-aliasing constraints when arbitrary quantization noise power spectral density is presented. Examples show that the proposed design gives SNRs less than 1 dB to the theoretical limit at different decimation ratios, while the group delay displays an approximately constant value.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207