MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098343998 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2007.4488664

Flatness-based control of an electrostatic torsional micro-mirror with voltage feedback

2007· article· en· W2098343998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlatness (cosmology)Control theory (sociology)Tilt (camera)VoltageComputer scienceAngular velocityPoint (geometry)OpticsPhysicsEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrostatic micro-mirrors are typically modelled in terms of the tilt angle, the angular velocity, and the electrical charge on the device. Although from a theoretical point of view this is a convenient choice, it is not practical due to the ensuing low resolution and the complexity of implementation related to charge measurement. The present paper addresses the practical control of a micro-mirror with the voltage across the device as a state variable. The technique of flat systems is employed to construct a closed-loop scheme for tracking control. Experimental testing results conducted on a scanning micro-mirror demonstrate that the developed control scheme can achieve good performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it