MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Monckeberg's calciphylaxis with necrosis of the glans penis: A case presentation

2007· article· en· W2098352798 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mathew D. Sorensen, Layron Long, Hunter Wessells, James K. Kuan

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePenectomyCalciphylaxisSurgeryGlansPenisUrethrostomyGangreneGlans penisCorpus SpongiosumEnd stage renal diseaseHemodialysisPenile cancerDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monckeberg's calcific sclerosis of the media of the small-sized and medium-sized arteries is a well described and potentially life-threatening condition seen almost exclusively in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and with hyperparathyroidism. Penile gangrene resulting from this entity is associated with a mortality as high as 64%. A 65-year-old man with ESRD on dialysis for 6 years was referred to Harborview Medical Center with severe penile pain and partial necrosis of his glans penis, which progressed despite medical management. The patient had previously undergone amputations on all four extremities. After intraoperative biopsies of the proximal corpora cavernosa and spongiosum demonstrated viable tissue, he underwent partial penectomy. Pathologic evaluation revealed calciphylaxis within the media of the penile vessels. Two months later the patient had persistent wound-healing issues with intractable pain and thus underwent a complete penectomy with ultimate resolution of his severe pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207