MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098355422

Functional outcome and persistent disability after isolated fracture of the femur.

2008· article· en· W2098355422 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Sanders, Mark MacLeod, Tanya Charyk-Stewart, Jeannette Lydestad, Andrea Domonkos, Christina Tieszer

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntramedullary rodFemoral shaftFemurSurgeryKnee painFemoral fractureOsteoporosisOsteoarthritisInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome and causes of persistent disability in patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated at an academic level-1 trauma centre. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 40 consecutive skeletally mature patients with isolated, nonpathologic diaphyseal femur fractures. All patients underwent fracture reduction and fixation using an antegrade locked intramedullary nail. We measured functional outcome using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). We obtained visual analog scores for pain in the groin, buttock, thigh and knee 6 months after the injury. RESULTS: Joint-related and musculoskeletal outcome scores improved gradually from the baseline assessment to the 6-month review. Mean scores (and standard deviations [SDs]) on the WOMAC index improved gradually from 57 (23) to 24 (22) for pain, from 57 (25) to 30 (20) for stiffness and from 70 (21) to 21 (23) for function (p < 0.001). The mean SMFA score (and SD) improved from 64 (13) to 25 (20) (p = 0.024). We noted no further improvements in functional outcome measures from the 6-month to the 12-month assessment (p > 0.21). Patients reported more pain in the knee than in other anatomic locations; the mean pain scores (and SDs) were 3.7 (3.1) in the knee, 2.5 (2.7) in the thigh, 1.7 (2.7) in the buttock and 1.0 (1.7) in the groin (p = 0.003). We noted correlations between knee pain and WOMAC pain (rho = 0.748, p < 0.001), function (rho = 0.701, p < 0.001) and SMFA (rho = 0.733, p < 0.001). We noted weaker correlations between thigh, groin and buttock pain and functional outcomes, with rho scores ranging from 0.2 to 0.55. CONCLUSION: Recovery from femur fractures occurs most rapidly in the first 6 months after injury. Residual deficits in functional outcome were still measurable 12 months after injury. Knee pain was the most common and most severe source of patient discomfort 12 months after isolated femur fractures, and demonstrated moderate to good correlation with general and joint-specific functional outcome measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207