MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098397716 · doi:10.1109/apec.2012.6166021

Control of grid-connected voltage source inverter with LCL filter

2012· article· en· W2098397716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)GridVoltage sourceLinear-quadratic regulatorInverterVoltageEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a control scheme for a grid-connected three-phase voltage source inverter with an LCL filter, which is suited for renewable energy applications. The proposed method has the following properties: fast tracking, optimized dynamics, grid disturbance rejection, and active resonance damping. The controller is based on an augmented linear quadratic regulation (LQR) scheme, which is optimized based on a weighted cost function. The LQR controller is augmented to include two complex conjugate poles at the grid frequency for sinusoidal voltage disturbance rejection upon connection to the grid. Furthermore, this control scheme actively damps the resonance introduced into the closed-loop system through the third-order LCL filter. Finally, the current reference is found by calculating the instantaneous power, which allows for faster power tracking compared to using the technique of measuring average power. Results verify the validity of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207