MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098397716 · doi:10.1109/apec.2012.6166021

Control of grid-connected voltage source inverter with LCL filter

2012· article· en· W2098397716 on OpenAlexaff
Suzan Eren, Alireza Bakhshai, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)GridVoltage sourceLinear-quadratic regulatorInverterVoltageEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a control scheme for a grid-connected three-phase voltage source inverter with an LCL filter, which is suited for renewable energy applications. The proposed method has the following properties: fast tracking, optimized dynamics, grid disturbance rejection, and active resonance damping. The controller is based on an augmented linear quadratic regulation (LQR) scheme, which is optimized based on a weighted cost function. The LQR controller is augmented to include two complex conjugate poles at the grid frequency for sinusoidal voltage disturbance rejection upon connection to the grid. Furthermore, this control scheme actively damps the resonance introduced into the closed-loop system through the third-order LCL filter. Finally, the current reference is found by calculating the instantaneous power, which allows for faster power tracking compared to using the technique of measuring average power. Results verify the validity of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207