MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098405376 · doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6

OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework

2011· article· en· W2098405376 on OpenAlexaff
Steven M. Boker, Michael C. Neale, Hermine H. Maes, Michael Wilde, Michael Spiegel, Timothy R. Brick, Jeffrey R. Spies, Ryne Estabrook, Sarah Kenny, Timothy C. Bates, Paras Mehta, John Fox

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychometrika · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsScripting languageStructural equation modelingComputer scienceInterface (matter)Open sourceProgramming languageSoftwareSoftware engineeringUser interfaceStatistical modelTheoretical computer scienceComputational scienceOperating systemMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenMx is free, full-featured, open source, structural equation modeling (SEM) software. OpenMx runs within the R statistical programming environment on Windows, Mac OS-X, and Linux computers. The rationale for developing OpenMx is discussed along with the philosophy behind the user interface. The OpenMx data structures are introduced - these novel structures define the user interface framework and provide new opportunities for model specification. Two short example scripts for the specification and fitting of a confirmatory factor model are next presented. We end with an abbreviated list of modeling applications available in OpenMx 1.0 and a discussion of directions for future development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.469
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.023 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,202
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychometrikaSame topicStatistical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207