MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098420408 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20046

Magnetically assisted gas–solid fluidization in a tapered vessel: First report with observations and dimensional analysis

2008· article· en· W2098420408 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jordan Hristov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluidizationScalingMechanicsSluggingMagnetic fieldFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceIntensity (physics)Fluidized bedThermodynamicsOpticsPhysicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The article presents first experimental results on gas–solid fluidization in a tapered bed in presence of an external transverse magnetic field that creates a novel branch in magnetically assisted fluidization. Phase diagrams similar to those used to describe cylindrical beds have been created to distinguish the bed regimes occurring under the action of two principle macroscopic variables such as field intensity and gas flow rate. A detailed analysis and parallelism to the bed behaviour exhibited by non‐magnetic spouted beds of cohesive particles have been performed. Principle process variables such as bed depth, field intensity, particle size, cone angle have been detected. A dimensional analysis utilizing a “pressure transform” of the initial set of variables has been applied to develop scaling relationships. Examples of scaling experimental data pertinent to the minimum spouting point and involving the magnetic granular Bond number have been developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207