MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098434322 · doi:10.1109/cwit.2013.6621603

Approximate bounds for limited backhaul uplink multicell processing with single-user compression

2013· article· en· W2098434322 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhan Zhou, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBase stationBackhaul (telecommunications)DecodesTelecommunications linkConstant (computer programming)Decoding methodsAlgorithmComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies single-user compression for the uplink multi-cell processing (MCP) model where multiple base-stations are connected to a central processor via noiseless backhaul links with a sum capacity constraint. The proposed scheme is based on the virtual multiple-access channel (V-MAC) architecture, where the base-stations quantize the received signals and send the quantized bits to the central processor, and at the decoder side the central processor first recovers the quantized signals then decodes the user messages in a successive manner. This paper focuses on the use of single-user compression in the V-MAC architecture, which is significantly simpler to implement than Wyner-Ziv compression. The main result of this paper is that single-user compression can achieve the sum capacity of the MCP model to within a constant gap under two specific scenarios. First, we define a diagonally dominant channel criterion and show the constant-gap result for the case when the covariance matrix of the received signals across the base-stations is κ-strictly diagonally dominant for some constant κ > 1. Second, we show that the constant-gap result holds for a special class of Wyner channel models in the weak interference regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207