A risk hypothesis and risk measures for throughput capacity in systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A basic risk hypothesis for system throughput capacity in the presence of risk is proposed. It is expressed as a basic risk equation , derived in the paper, and governs all nongrowth, nonevolving, agent-directed systems. The basic risk equation shows how expected throughput capacity increases linearly with positive risk of loss of throughput capacity. The conventional standard deviation risk measure, from financial systems, may be used. A proposed new measure, the mean-expected loss risk measure with respect to the hazard-free case, is shown to be more appropriate for systems in general. The concept of an efficient system environment is also proposed. The well-known financial risk equation, hitherto deduced empirically, may be derived from the basic risk equation. When there is both risk exposure and resource sharing, the basic risk equation may be combined with a resource-sharing equation that governs how throughput capacity changes with the resource-sharing level. The basic risk equation also allows for risk elimination and reduction. All quantities in the equation are precisely defined, and their units are specified. The risk equation reduces to a useful numerical expression in practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it