Changing Habits: Deconstructing One Convent School Song
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For an initial assignment in a Curriculum Studies graduate course, the author was required to write a story based on an experience from her own convent school days. Disconcerted by what appeared to be a memory block, she finally produced a text, but it was metaphorical rather than anecdotal. In this paper she attempts to understand her inability to articulate her experiences by using deconstruction, Lacanian analysis, and poetry to explore the metaphor embedded in her initial text. The insight and voice she gains through the layered writing process leads her to suggest that a reflective teaching practice and a critical pedagogy might intersect in the novel reframings of personal educational experiences. By breaking out of our habits of representation we may be more likely to recognize-and transform-our habits of interpretation. About the Author Anne Hewson is an associate professor at St. Thomas University in New Brunswick, Canada, where she teaches in the Education Department. Her interests include arts-based inquiry, drama education, mindfulness in learning and teaching, poststructural theory, and critical pedagogy. Anne can be contacted at ahewson@stu.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it