Effect of Skin Depth on Hardness Profile of Gear Heated by Induction Using 2D Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is carried principally by simulation efforts using computer-modeling software (COMSOL). The developed 2D model includes the coupling between electromagnetic and thermal fields, and takes account of the nonlinear behaviour of material properties versus temperature. Several steps were followed to reach this goal. First, a 2D finite element model of a gear was developed in order to simulate the induced currents density and temperature distributions for various frequencies and external currents applied in the coil. Second, the temperature profiles were compared using the ratio between the skin depth and the teeth height. In geometry cases, it was possible to dose the power level of the medium (MF) and high (HF) frequencies to reach a desired uniform case depth. The MF and HF powers are simulated sequentially in order to better concentrate heat in the tooth tip and root of gear. The obtained results help process developers to select the proper parameters for the induction machine in order to achieve the desired hardness profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it