MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098547921 · doi:10.1139/t2012-055

Coupled water retention and shrinkage properties of a compacted silt under isotropic and deviatoric stress paths

2012· article· en· W2098547921 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C.F. Chiu, Charles W. W. Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesCentral University Basic Research Fund of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStress pathDegree of saturationShrinkageIsotropyGeotechnical engineeringStress (linguistics)Materials scienceEffective stressSaturation (graph theory)SiltSuctionConstitutive equationHysteresisMechanicsMathematicsComposite materialSoil waterGeologyPlasticitySoil scienceFinite element methodThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although it is generally recognized that unsaturated soil behavior is governed by two constitutive variables (matric suction and net normal stress) and that the hydromechanical behavior of unsaturated soil is coupled, a water retention curve obtained from tests under zero stress and assuming no volume change is still fairly common. A relatively limited number of studies on the stress path–dependent water retention curve (SDWRC), particularly under a broader range of stress paths, exist in the literature. In this paper, the SDWRC, shrinkage curve, and swelling curve of a compacted silt subjected to isotropic and deviatoric stress paths are presented. The test results show that the air-entry value (AEV) increases, but the hydraulic hysteresis loop decreases with an increase in net mean stress. Furthermore, for a given stress level, the K 0 -compressed specimen exhibits higher AEV, but a smaller hysteresis loop than that of the isotropically compressed specimen. A nonlinear shrinkage curve is observed and the gradient of the post-yield shrinkage curve depends on the degree of saturation and net mean stress, but is independent of the stress path. For the range of suction studied, the gradient reduces with a decreasing degree of saturation, but with an increasing net mean stress. Finally, the test results are compared with the prediction of a model based on two independent constitutive stress variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207