MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098560698 · doi:10.1109/tencon.1996.608459

Multi-resolution motion estimation at low bit-rates

2002· article· en· W2098560698 on OpenAlexaff
G.R. Rajugopal, Sawsan M. Mahmoud, Roshdy H. M. Hafez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion estimationComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)Quarter-pixel motionMotion compensationBit ratePixelCoding tree unitCoding (social sciences)AlgorithmComputer visionImage resolutionArtificial intelligenceResidualMathematicsReal-time computingDecoding methodsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of multi-resolution motion estimation schemes in low bit-rate video coding are presented. Video frames are individually wavelet decomposed and motion activity is detected using variable block size multi-resolution motion estimation (MRME) schemes. The residual frames are coded using zero tree quantization, followed by arithmetic entropy coding. The MRME schemes are shown to exploit the motion correlation among subbands of different scales. We show that the MRME schemes behave differently, than as shown by Zafar et al. (1993), in low bit rate applications employing zero tree quantization. Simulation results are provided for coding of QCIF resolution (176/spl times/144 pixels) video frames at 10 frames/sec, coded at various low bit-rates. Four different MRME schemes are evaluated and performance comparisons are provided for several low output bit-rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207