An artificial neural network based transmission loss allocation for bilateral contracts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The introduction of deregulation and the subsequent open access policy in electricity sector have opened up the door for power transactions between generators and bulk consumers under many different market-driven contractual forms including bilateral contracts. Long-term bilateral contracts are attractive to many parties who want to avoid price volatility. With bilateral contracts it becomes necessary to allocate transmission loss to respective transactions. An artificial neural network based transmission loss allocation method is presented in this paper. The method is computationally efficient and can provide solutions on a real-time basis. Most independent system variables can be used as inputs to this neural network which in turn makes the loss allocation process responsive to practical situations. Training and testing of this network have been done with the help of the IEEE 24-bus test system. A technique has been developed to expedite the convergence and to improve the accuracy of the results. Numerical examples on loss allocations for both peak and off-peak hours have been provided and compared with those obtained using another technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it