Formation of bowtie‐shaped excitation in a photonic–microfluidic integrated devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Narrowly confining the beam intensity in a well‐defined region in the center of cell flow is a necessary step to perform reliable flow cytometry testing but has so far not been achieved in a photonic–microfluidic integrated device.We were able to focus the excitation beam to a very narrow bowtie shape with a near uniform intensity across the flow stream for excitation for a flow cytometry application. Beam geometry was achieved by integrating a one‐dimensional lens system with planar waveguides and a microfluidic channel on one substrate using one patterning material via a one‐shot process. This letter reports the method used to achieve such shaped beams and the performance of the shaped beams. © 2011 National Research Council Canada & Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53:2583–2586, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.26309
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".