MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098606827 · doi:10.7202/705978ar

Évaluation au Québec d’un modèle de prédiction de la fin de la période annuelle d’éjection des ascospores du Venturia inaequalis.

2005· article· fr· W2098606827 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsQuebec Society for the Protection of PlantsEspace pour la vieUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un modèle de prédiction de la fin de la période des éjections d'ascospores du Venturia inaequalis , développé à partir de données recueillies au New Hampshire, a été évalué dans sept localités de pomoculture québécoise, entre 1981 et 1987. Pour Frelighsburg 1983 et Saint-Joseph-du-Lac 1982, à la date à laquelle le modèle a estimé le niveau de 100% d'ascospores matures, les valeurs observées n'ont pas différé significativement des estimés; dans tous les autres cas, les valeurs observées ont été significativement inférieures aux estimés avec une différence variant entre 4,2 % et 35,4 %. Le modèle a aussi prédit trop tôt la fin de la période d'éjection des ascospores dans 12 cas sur 16, alors qu'il restait entre 14% et 70% des ascospores dans les pseudothèces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it