<i>Lakukullus anatisrostratus</i>, gen. et sp. nov., a new massive nothrotheriid sloth (Xenarthra, Pilosa) from the middle Miocene of Bolivia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xenarthra constitute one of the most representative groups of South American endemic mammals. The armored Cingulata is recorded beginning in the Itaboraian SALMA (lower Eocene; Pujos et al., 2012). Its sister group is Pilosa, which includes Tardigrada, the sloths, and Vermilingua, the South American anteaters. Sloths appear during the Eocene–Oligocene transition (Tinguirirican SALMA) in Chile, represented by Pseudoglyptodon (McKenna et al., 2006). The late Oligocene Deseadan SALMA saw the emergence of Mylodontidae (e.g., Octodontotherium and Orophodon) and Megalonychidae (e.g., Deseadognathus) in Patagonia and the Bolivian altiplano (Pujos et al., 2007). Megatherioidea appear later during the middle Miocene, Megatheriidae in the Santacrucian SALMA (i.e., Megathericulus; Pujos et al., 2013), and Nothrotheriidae in the Huayquerian SALMA (i.e., Mionothropus; De Iuliis et al., 2011). According to De Iuliis et al. (2011), Nothrotheriidae is supported by 13 unequivocal synapomorphies and includes at least five genera: Mionothropus, Pronothrotherium, Thalassocnus, Nothrotherium, and Nothrotheriops. Several possible nothrotheriids, generally represented by poor material, have been described from Colombia (Huilabradys), Argentina (e.g., Nothropus, Chasicobradys, Amphibradys, and Xyophorus), and Bolivia (Xyophorus and Hiskatherium). Those from Argentina are poorly diagnosed, cannot certainly be differentiated morphologically from other taxa such as Hapalops, and are likely invalid. Nothropus priscus is exclusive to the Pleistocene of Argentina and is not present in the Amazon (see De Iuliis et al., 2011, for further details).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".