MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098660704 · doi:10.1103/physreve.68.046127

Diffusion in channeled structures: Xenon in a crystalline sodalite

2003· article· en· W2098660704 on OpenAlexaff
Benoit Palmieri, David Ronis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodaliteSmoluchowski coagulation equationXenonDiffusionCrystal (programming language)PhysicsDilutionPlane (geometry)Materials scienceThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsClassical mechanicsAtomic physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theory of Ronis and Vertenstein [J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1628 (1986)] is used to calculate the permeability of xenon in Theta-1, a crystalline sodalite containing one-dimensional channels. The required time-correlation functions are obtained from numerical simulations performed using a small number of target crystal atoms. The dynamics of the target atoms reproduce those of the full crystal by the means of a generalized Langevin equation of motion. An approximate expression for the potential of mean force inside the crystal is derived. The plane average space-dependent diffusion coefficient D(z) obeys the Smoluchowski prediction at infinite dilution. The permeability is reported and compared in detail with that obtained from transition state theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207