MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098698554 · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-14-00059.1

Testing of a Cell-Integrated Semi-Lagrangian Semi-Implicit Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Solver (CSLAM-NH) with Idealized Orography

2014· article· en· W2098698554 on OpenAlexaff
May Wong, William C. Skamarock, P. H. Lauritzen, Joseph B. Klemp, Roland B. Stull

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOrographySolverMesoscale meteorologyDiscretizationOrographic liftScalar (mathematics)MeteorologyApplied mathematicsTerrainLagrangianGeologyMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisGeometryMathematical optimizationPrecipitationGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A recently developed cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian (CISL) semi-implicit nonhydrostatic atmospheric solver that uses the conservative semi-Lagrangian multitracer (CSLAM) transport scheme is extended to include orographic influences. With the introduction of a new semi-implicit CISL discretization of the continuity equation, the nonhydrostatic solver, called CSLAM-NH, has been shown to ensure inherently conservative and numerically consistent transport of air mass and other scalar variables, such as moisture and passive tracers. The extended CSLAM-NH presented here includes two main modifications: transformation of the equation set to a terrain-following height coordinate to incorporate orography and an iterative centered-implicit time-stepping scheme to enhance the stability of the scheme associated with gravity wave propagation at large time steps. CSLAM-NH is tested for a suite of idealized 2D flows, including linear mountain waves (dry), a downslope windstorm (dry), and orographic cloud formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207