Thieno, Furo, and Selenopheno[3,4‐<i>c</i>]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione Copolymers: Air‐Processed Polymer Solar Cells with Power Conversion Efficiency up to 7.1%
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymers based on thieno[3,4‐ c ]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione derivatives are interesting and promising candidates for organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. Herein, a series of push–pull conjugated polymers based on thieno[3,4‐ c ]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione (TPD), furo[3,4‐ c ]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione (FPD), and selenopheno[3,4‐ c ]‐pyrrole‐4,6‐dione (SePD) have been synthesized by direct heteroarylation polymerization and fully characterized. The impacts of both the heteroatom (sulfur, oxygen, and selenium) and the side chain (branched or linear) of [3,4‐ c ]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione unit on the electro‐optical properties have been investigated. Among polymers developed, two new highly processable terthiophene–SePD ( P4 ) and dithienosilole–SePD ( P9 ) copolymers led to air‐processed polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiencies of 5.1% and 7.1% using the following inverted configuration: ITO/ZnO/Polymer:PCBM/MoO 3 /Ag. These promising results make P4 and P9 good candidates for further upscaling and device optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".