Canadian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CJBAS publishes high-quality solicited and unsolicited articles in all areas of : Electrical engineering (Computer, Electronic, Optical, Power) - Chemical engineering (Biomolecular, Materials, Molecular, Process, Petroleum) - Civil engineering (Environmental, Geological, Structural, Transport) - Mechanical engineering (Aerospace, Acoustical, Manufacturing, Thermal, Vehicle) - Nanoengineering - History - Linguistics - Literature Performing arts Philosophy - Religion - Visual arts - Social sciences - Anthropology - Archaeology - Area studies - Cultural and ethnic studies - Economics - Geography - Political science - Psychology - Sociology - Natural science - Space sciences - Earth sciences - Life sciences - Chemistry - Physics - Formal sciences - Computer sciences - Logic - Mathematics - Statistics - Systems science - Professions and Applied sciences - Agriculture - Architecture and Design - Business - Divinity - Education - Engineering - Environmental studies and Forestry - Family and consumer science - Healthcare science - Human physical performance and recreation - Journalism, media studies and communication - Law - Library and museum studies - Military sciences - Public administration - Social work - Transportation and any other area of studies .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it