MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of plant trichomes and caterpillar group size on growth and defence of the pipevine swallowtail <i> Battus philenor</i>

2001· article· en· W2098744006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Ecology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrichomeAristolochiaBiologyInstarPredationLepidoptera genitaliaCaterpillarPredatorLarvaBotanyPopulationHorticultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The California population of the pipevine swallowtail Battus philenor is a specialist on the Dutchman’s pipe Aristolochia californica , an endemic vine that is densely covered with trichomes. Populations of B. philenor outside California use other Aristolochia species that are largely glabrous. The average clutch size of the pipevine swallowtail is larger in California compared with populations elsewhere and larvae feed gregariously until late in the third instar. In the field, caterpillars consumed more leaf material and showed preference for portions of leaves with trichomes removed. However, large groups of caterpillars were consistently observed feeding on the apical portion of the plant, where trichome density was highest. Smaller groups of caterpillars were observed feeding more often on mature leaves on the lower portions of the plant, where trichome density was lower. Laboratory experiments showed that the walking speed of a commonly observed predator, larvae of the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea , was reduced as trichome density increased. Furthermore, lacewing search efficiency and capture rate of a model prey item were compromised by high trichome density. In an additional field experiment, no difference was found in the percentage mortality of groups of four and 12 caterpillars. However, growth rate of the larger group was accelerated by 25% compared with smaller groups. In an experiment using a ladybird beetle larva Hippodamia convergens as the predator, no difference was observed in absolute mortality of caterpillars, suggesting that group size does not function directly as a defence against predators. First instar caterpillars are most vulnerable to predators, thus feeding in larger groups may benefit caterpillars by accelerating growth. Feeding in large groups may also be an effective strategy for B. philenor to overcome plant trichomes and feed on portions of the plant conducive to faster development. However, feeding on areas with dense trichomes does not appear to provide larvae with a refuge from predators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it