MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epitope specificity and significance in systemic autoimmune diseases

2010· review· en· W2098814276 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Mähler, Marvin J. Fritzler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDr. Fooke Laboratorien
KeywordsAutoantibodyAutoimmunityEpitopeImmunologyAutoimmune diseaseImmune systemComputational biologyBiologyAntigenMedicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by self-reactive immune processes mediated by B and T cells. These disorders exhibit a spectrum of clinical features that range from local or organ specific to systemic diseases. Although a variety of putative mechanisms that trigger the loss of tolerance and thus the genesis of autoimmunity have been identified, for the most part the precise mechanisms remain elusive. Nevertheless, it is widely appreciated that autoantibodies are useful both in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders and as molecular biological tools to study cellular processes in which the target antigens are involved. Several methods and technologies, including protein fragments, synthetic peptides, phage display, or structural analyses have been developed for the characterization of the specificity of the autoimmune reactions. The present review provides an overview of the autoantibody epitopes in systemic autoimmune diseases as they relate to the clinical relevance and applications of certain autoepitopes and the technologies that are used to classify and identify them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207