MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098824235 · doi:10.7202/032802ar

Vallées de débâcle et processus cryokarstiques sur Mars et en Sibérie

2007· article· fr· W2098824235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
F. Costard

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsMars Exploration ProgramGeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le climat froid et sec de la planète Mars implique le maintien d'un pergélisol. À Yakutsk (Sibérie), l'épaisseur maximale du pergélisol est de 1,5 km. Une analyse comparative entre les vallées de débâcle en Sibérie et celles de la planète Mars est proposée. Elle fait appel au processus d'érosion thermique produit par le contact de l'eau liquide avec le pergélisol. La fonte des glaces de ségrégation sous la vallée implique la formation d'un talik. Celui-ci facilite la prise en charge des sédiments et l'enfoncement de la vallée. En Sibérie, le sapement le long des berges par érosion thermique provoque un rapide recul des versants qui expliquerait la largeur excessive des vallées de débâcle sur Mars. Avec le climat froid de la planète Mars et de la Sibérie, le pergélisol, empêche l'infiltration de l'eau tout en facilitant l'étalement des sédiments à l'embouchure des vallées. La présence de couches massives de glace dans le sous-sol et leurs fontes préférentielles contribue au développement d'un cryokarst comme celui des vallées d'alas en Yakoutie. Une comparaison est proposée entre le cryokarst de la Yakoutie et certaines dépressions fermées sur Mars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207