MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098846132 · doi:10.1002/geot.201300045

Rapid shaft sinking / Mechanisiertes Abteufen von Schächten

2013· article· en· W2098846132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomechanics and Tunnelling · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanical engineeringEngineeringArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In 2011 Herrenknecht designed a shaft sinking machine suitable for applications in frozen ground or soft to medium hard rock up to 120 Mpa, with variable shaft diameters as well as geometries. The target was to develop a machine that will provide safe working conditions for the personnel and exceed the shaft sinking rates of conventional systems. Two prototypes were manufactured and assembled at the Herrenknecht works in Schwanau during winter/spring 2012. In early summer of 2012, cutting trials were performed with the aim of achieving the maximal possible cutting rate performance. After successful completion of the cutting trials, the machines where shipped to Canada and assembled at the site. In November 2012, the first machine was lowered into the shaft and first cutting cycles where performed before Christmas 2012. Assembly and commissioning of the second machine follows in early 2013. Die Herrenknecht AG hat im Jahr 2011 eine Maschine für das maschinelle Abteufen von Schächten in gefrorenem Boden oder weichem bis mittelhartem Gestein mit einer Druckfestigkeit von bis zu 120 MPa entwickelt. Ein großes Ziel dieser Entwicklung war, die Arbeitsbedingungen für das Personal im Schacht sicherer zu gestalten sowie die Schachtabteufgeschwindigkeit konventioneller Anlagen zu übertreffen. Zwei Prototypen wurden hergestellt und im Zeitraum Winter 2011 bis Frühjahr 2012 auf dem Werksgelände der Herrenknecht AG in Schwanau montiert. Schneidversuche fanden im Frühjahr 2012 mit dem Ziel statt, die maximal mögliche Schneidleistung zu ermitteln. Nach erfolgreichem Abschluss der Schneidversuche wurden die Maschinen nach Kanada ausgeliefert und am Standort aufgebaut. Im November 2012 wurde die erste Maschine in den Vorschacht abgesenkt und die ersten Schneidzyklen noch vor Weihnachten 2012 durchgeführt. Aufbau und Inbetriebnahme der zweiten Maschine erfolgte im Sommer 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it