Control of the radiative properties via photon-plasmon interaction in Er^3+-Tm^3+-codoped tellurite glasses in the near infrared region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novelty of this paper is that it reports on the tuning of the spectral properties of Er3+ -Tm3+ ions in tellurite glasses in the near-infrared region through the incorporation of silver or gold nanoparticles. These noble metal nanoparticles can improve the emission intensity and expand the bandwidth of the luminescence spectrum centered at 1535 nm, covering practically all the optical telecommunication bands (S, C + L and U), and extended up to 2010 nm wavelength under excitation by a 976 nm laser diode. Both effects are obtained by the combined emission of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions due to efficient energy transfer processes promoted by the presence of silver or gold nanoparticles for the (Er3+)4I(11/2)→(Tm3+)3H5, (Er3+)4I(13/2)→(Tm3+)3H4 and (Er3+)4I(13/2)→(Tm3+)3F4 transitions. The interactions between the electronic transitions of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions that provide a tunable emission are associated with the dynamic coupling mechanism described by the variations generated by the Hamiltonian H DC in either the oscillator strength or the local crystal field, i.e. the line shape changes in the near-infrared emission band. The Hamiltonian is expressed as eigenmodes associated with the density of the conduction electron generated by the different nanoparticles through its collective free oscillations at each resonance frequency of the nanoparticle and their geometric dependence. A complete description of photon-plasmon interactions of noble metal nanoparticles with the Er3+ and Tm3+ ions is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".