MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wind Pressures on Parapets of Flat Roofs

2002· article· en· W2098875937 on OpenAlexafffund
Ted Stathopoulos, Patrick J. Saathoff, Rania Bedair

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Architectural Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRoofFlat roofWind engineeringStructural engineeringWind tunnelBuilding modelEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringSimulationAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wind-tunnel study has been carried out to assess wind pressures acting on parapets, including their top surfaces. Local and area-averaged pressure coefficients were measured on parapets of flat-roof models with a length to height ratio (L/H) of 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1. The results were obtained for full-scale equivalent parapet heights of 1 and 2 m and for wind directions ranging from zero to 315°. The local wind load on the parapet was found to be approximately 30% larger at the windward corner of the building than at the midspan location. Maximum parapet loads for the low building model were approximately 30% larger than those for the cubical model. Parapet height did not significantly affect the peak local load on the parapet except in the corner region, where the inward load (toward the roof) for the 1 m parapet was 25% higher than that for the 2 m parapet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Architectural EngineeringSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207